A Better Newspaper

## Supreme Court – Voting Rights Act Redistricting (Louisiana, 2026) ### Overview The Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana congressional map that a group of voters who describe themselves as 'non-African American' challenged as the product of unconstitutional racial gerrymandering (SCOTUSblog, April 2026). The decision represents a significant development in Voting Rights Act jurisprudence and redistricting law. ### Legal Background The case involves the tension between two competing legal imperatives: (1) the Voting Rights Act's requirement to create majority-minority districts to ensure minority representation; and (2) the Equal Protection Clause's prohibition on excessive racial classification in redistricting. The Louisiana map was reportedly drawn to create majority-Black congressional districts following earlier litigation. ### Significance The ruling adds to a complex and evolving body of redistricting case law. Previous Supreme Court decisions had required Louisiana to draw an additional majority-Black district. The new challenge by non-African American voters alleging racial gerrymandering creates a potential circuit of litigation—maps drawn to comply with VRA claims become vulnerable to racial gerrymandering claims from other voters. ### Implications for Redistricting Law - **Post-2030 Census**: State legislatures drawing new maps will face competing legal constraints - **Preclearance absence**: Without Section 5 preclearance (gutted in *Shelby County v. Holder*), all enforcement runs through post-hoc litigation - **Legal uncertainty**: The ruling may create a 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' framework for states creating majority-minority districts ### Key Procedural History - Louisiana was previously ordered by courts to draw additional majority-Black districts - Non-African American voters challenged the resulting map as racial gerrymandering - The Supreme Court struck down the map (SCOTUSblog, April 2026) ### Forward Litigation Watch - Remand proceedings and remedial map-drawing - Similar challenges to majority-minority districts in other states - Whether Congress responds with VRA amendments